REGISTER by November 9
IN THE CCCR LAY NETWORK IN YOUR PARISH AND DEANERY TO BE ELIGIBLE TO VOTE FOR A BISHOP/ARCHBISHOP CANDIDATE.
CLICK HERE TO REGISTER!
Please register your name, email address, home address, and parish (if any) to join in a strong lay voice on matters of concern in our Archdiocese.
We need your home address to place you geographically in the Archdiocese. Thanks.
November 6, 2014: About the CCCR Bishop Selection Campaign: CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD A
FLYER YOU CAN PRINT FOR FRIENDS!
We are in the VOTING phase of the campaign for a people’s voice in the selection of our leadership.
First, the people nominated leaders. Then a committee of the people who were likely to know the
nominees selected seven of them for the slate. Now it is up to all the people of the archdiocese
to vote for three of those seven when they get ballots by email in the first two weeks of November. If
you prefer, you may write-in the names of leaders not on the ballot.
The seven local pastors on the slate are Fathers Mike Byron, Paul Feela, Paul Jaroszeski, Charles
Lachowitzer, Phil Rask, Tim Wozniak, and Bishop Lee Piché.
These seven men had no involvement in the process and were not consulted in advance of their selection by the Committee. We are calling them to leadership based on the people’s confidence in them. As we cannot elect our bishops, as explained below, any appointment will come from Pope Francis, and if one of these men is appointed, he may decline at that time.
Preparing to vote means we have to get some information about the nominees. CCCR has produced
profiles of the nominees with the information we could find. You can find them by clicking on "Bishop
Selection" in the left menu and then going to "Priest Profiles."
If you know one of the nominees and can endorse him to be bishop/archbishop, you are invited to make a statement we will publish on this website. Call Paula at 651-219-5909. See Testimonials below.
Fr. Michael Byron is an outstanding candidate for Bishop. We have experienced him as a teacher and a visiting Priest and feel he has all the qualities needed for the position of Bishop.
The combination of his academic background ( both his own and his teaching at Holy Angels High School and at the St. Paul Seminary) in combination with his experience as parish priest give him a depth of understanding of people and a knowledge of the church that would serve him well as Bishop.
His leadership qualities became apparent at a very early age being elected to the Parish Council of Our Lady of Grace Catholic Church (his home parish) in his early twenties. These qualities continue to surface in every aspect of his ministry.
He has a heart of compassion---not judgement, and in his words: "A priest should live among the people as one who is noted as kind, charitable and generous...." He has a heart for the poor and marginalized much like our Pope Francis that can bring healing to our Diocese. To quote Fr. Byron, "do not remain silent in the face of injustice just to keep peace. Take a stand on behalf of the invisible ones."
Fr. Michael Byron is exceptionally qualified candidate for Bishop.
Phillip K. and Gloria W. Smith
Christ the King Catholic Church
I do not know Fr. Michael Byron personally, and what leads me to recommend him is what I have heard from a couple people who attended St. Cecilia's when he was there. The comments were that he was both pastorally and intellectually contemporary. His dissertation on the Church as symbol, as described in Lumen Gentium, tells me much about his thinking. Also, his advisor, Roger Haight, and his focus on pluralism is important to me.
So he seems to have both a pastoral and theological orientation that would make for a good bishop.
Observation:-I know Father Paul Jaroszeski as the Pastor of St. Katherine Drexel Parish in Ramsey, MN. I worked with him as a member of the Parish Start Up Committee when we first opened up the parish and also in various ways over the past years.
I endorse Father Paul and believe he would be a good Bishop because he is not interested in the pomp and ceremony of the office but more interested in working with and helping the followers of Jesus Christ in a personal way. He listens to all sides of an issue, is very fair and nonjudgmental to begin with, and has the ability to engage people so they feel that their points are being listened to and his decisions are well received. He is very pleasant and greets all parishioners quite well and is not so rigid that he will not listen to new ideas. His homilies are well thought out, presented in a meaningful way, and very pertinent to the everyday life of the parishioners. My experiences with him have been very positive and as our parish has not met the enrollment numbers that had been projected he has stayed very upbeat and supportive as we have gone from a designation “to be determined” to “a parish in formation” by the Archdiocese. Lastly I believe he would make a good Bishop because he is not actively seeking this position but supports the premise that the lay parishioners should have a stronger voice in selecting their leadership in the Catholic Church.
Dr. Thomas Carey
St. Katherine Drexel
Prior to retirement I had 52 years of service in Education and 33 years in Catholic schools. I was also involved in starting St. Gerard’s Parish in Brooklyn Park in 1969 and am a member of the Knights of Columbus.
Bishop Selection Process
Thanks to everyone who nominated a local pastor for the role of bishop/archbishop in this Archdiocese.
And thanks to the Consultant Committee of the CCCR Bishop Selection Task Force for their work in winnowing the nominations from 55 to seven. The Consultant Committee consists of five priests, Fathers Stephen Adrian, John M. Bauer, John Brandes, Patrick Griffin, and Dale Korogi, and three lay people, Cathy Edwards, Patricia Gries, and James Moudry. Carol Tauer is the Committee Coordinator.
The Committee considered the number of nominations each person received, the qualifications listed below, and the gifts as they knew them of each man on the list. The chief quality they considered was the ability to unify people in a polarized community.
In November we arel voting to narrow the list to three. The purpose of the voting is
- to accustom ourselves to the idea of selecting our own leadership, and
- to determine who among the local pastors has the confidence of the people to lead us in the mission of the Church.
You may write-in nominees on the ballot if you so desire.
Because we cannot at this time elect our leadership, after this balloting process we will then ask you to write to the papal nuncio, Archbishop Carlo Maria Viganò, the Vatican ambassador to the U.S. whose responsibility it is to recommend names to Rome for appointment. In your letter you may recommend one or more of the three final names or anyone you think qualified. The reason for writing individually to the papal nuncio is that the Vatican discourages organized group recommendations to avoid campaigning and factions.
This initial attempt to make the people's voice heard is far from an ideal process. It is a first step to filling a crucial need in our Archdiocese. Fr. Stephen Adrian, part of the Bishop Selection Task Force, has expressed the need like this:
To lead one must have the trust and confidence of the community.... It is essential that the next archbishop be selected only after a broad consultative process involving clergy, religious and laity. The process should include an opportunity to articulate the qualities we need in a bishop; the process should also allow people to suggest names of persons they consider meeting those qualities.
For an ideal process we would need Archdiocesan cooperation. That is a future to be prayed for. In the meantime we take first steps.
Rationales for Reducing the Number of Nominees
On the principle that the people under the bishop’s jurisdiction should have a voice in choosing him, the Task Force first eliminated nominations from people outside the Archdiocese. Secondly, believing that local pastors are more likely to be familiar with the needs of the Archdiocese, we eliminated nominees from other jurisdictions.
Reluctantly, we eliminated the much-appreciated senior nominees—70 and over. Since a bishop is required by canon law to tender his resignation at the age of 75 and it is probable that the investigative and appointment process is lengthy, a person over the age of 70 would not have sufficient time to serve. That left us with a list of 43 names.
Eliminating all nominees with only one nomination resulted in a list of 23 names from which the Consultant Committee chose the seven named above.
TELL YOUR FRIENDS THEY MUST REGISTER ON THE LAY NETWORK TO GET A BALLOT TO VOTE. See Registration at the top of this artilce. THANKS.
Criteria Used in Reducing the Number of Nominees to a Slate
The bishop should have:
- The ability to unify polarized factions and bring Catholics together to accomplish the Church’s mission.
- Significant pastoral experience in parish, hospital, or similar settings (not solely academic, Chancery, etc.).
- A reputation for being credible and trustworthy and for valuing transparency and accountability.
- Theological competence.
- An ethic of servant leadership on the model of Pope Francis.
- Demonstrated willingness to foster two-way communication with clergy and laity.
- Demonstrated skill as a public speaker and preacher.
- Evidence of leadership skills within the archdiocese.
- Demonstrated administrative skills.
- Involvement in promoting social justice and fostering concern for the poor and disenfranchised.
- Ability to engage and relate to people of multiple generations.
- Demonstrated commitment to interfaith efforts and cooperation.
- Sensitivity to and credibility with diverse communities.